<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google says mistakenly got wireless data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allaboutgadget.com/google-says-mistakenly-got-wireless-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allaboutgadget.com/google-says-mistakenly-got-wireless-data/</link>
	<description>All the things about technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:35:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutgadget.com/google-says-mistakenly-got-wireless-data/comment-page-1/#comment-1544</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 13:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutgadget.com/google-says-mistakenly-got-wireless-data/#comment-1544</guid>
		<description>Dear carolyn,

Thanks so much for the feedback, I knew this is odd, and myself feel laugh also when read it :), but allaboutgadget is so far still under &#039;fit and proper&#039; test as another good source of reading. 

Thanks again and sorry for the oddness thing related to the grammar and syntax. I hope they are properly written now..

thanks n warm regards,
allaboutgadget team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear carolyn,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for the feedback, I knew this is odd, and myself feel laugh also when read it <img src='http://www.allaboutgadget.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> , but allaboutgadget is so far still under 'fit and proper' test as another good source of reading. </p>
<p>Thanks again and sorry for the oddness thing related to the grammar and syntax. I hope they are properly written now..</p>
<p>thanks n warm regards,<br />
allaboutgadget team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carolyn</title>
		<link>http://www.allaboutgadget.com/google-says-mistakenly-got-wireless-data/comment-page-1/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 13:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allaboutgadget.com/google-says-mistakenly-got-wireless-data/#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>What the heck. The grammar and syntax of this article makes no sense. Examples
Google remarkable which only &quot;fragments&quot; -should be remarked?? Oh gee, remarkable was used over and over again.

To violate the law requires which the interception was intentional,&quot; mentioned Hofmann. Huh???

Last month, 4 United States Senators sent a minute to Facebook, - They sent a minute? Maybe this is just a term I don&#039;t know, but what does that mean??

Google Inc mentioned the swift of cars obliged for photographing streets around the universe have for several years incidentally picked up personal report — Even the first sentence is off somehow.

The association mentioned on Friday which it is right away reaching out to regulators in the applicable countries, which comprise the United States, (HUH, I&#039;ve sure never seen which used so many ways that don&#039;t make sense. 

I&#039;m sorry but when something is so poorly written I question the entire article. Does anyone else find this strange?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck. The grammar and syntax of this article makes no sense. Examples<br />
Google remarkable which only "fragments" -should be remarked?? Oh gee, remarkable was used over and over again.</p>
<p>To violate the law requires which the interception was intentional," mentioned Hofmann. Huh???</p>
<p>Last month, 4 United States Senators sent a minute to Facebook, - They sent a minute? Maybe this is just a term I don't know, but what does that mean??</p>
<p>Google Inc mentioned the swift of cars obliged for photographing streets around the universe have for several years incidentally picked up personal report — Even the first sentence is off somehow.</p>
<p>The association mentioned on Friday which it is right away reaching out to regulators in the applicable countries, which comprise the United States, (HUH, I've sure never seen which used so many ways that don't make sense. </p>
<p>I'm sorry but when something is so poorly written I question the entire article. Does anyone else find this strange?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
